Moundville Archaeological Repository Theft

Last Modified: 09 Oct 2012

Moundvillde Moundville Engraved, variety unspecified Stolen during reposatory theft (from the University of Alabama website)

Organized theft of over 250 archaeologically-excavated artefacts from a repository in Alabama.

The site of Moundville near Tuscaloosa, Alabama (USA), was the ceremonial centre of a Mississippian polity from the eleventh to the sixteenth century AD. It is a National Historic Landmark, it is on the National Register of Historic Places, and it consists of twenty-nine platform mounds and a rectangular plaza. The protected area also contains a museum, an archaeological laboratory, and an associated archaeological repository.

In 1980 thieves broke into the Erskine Ramsey Archaeological Repository on the Moundville site. They stole 264 pottery vessels, including ‘many of the highest-quality specimens ever excavated at Moundville’, which had been archaeologically excavated in the 1930s (University of Alabama n.d.; Reeves 2009).

Moundville Archaeological Site, source unknown.The theft was reported on 6 March, 1980 (Vitelli 1981: 361) when students from the University of Michigan discovered boxes full of antiquities lined up against the repository wall as if waiting to be carried away. This has led some to speculate that the artefacts had been moved in several trips, with at least one more trip planned (Reeves 2009). The stolen pottery represents one fifth of the entire Moundville vessel collection and seventy per cent of the site’s museum-quality pieces (University of Alabama, n.d.; Reeves 2009). This clear focus on high quality pieces may indicate that the thieves were familiar enough with Mississippian artefacts to be able to tell the difference (Reeves 2009). The theft at Moundville remains the largest recorded antiquities theft in the South of the United States (Reeves 2009).

According to Jim Knight, chairman of anthropology at the Tuscaloosa campus of the University of Alabama, the theft at Moundville was not adequately publicised after it occurred (Reeves 2009). Although a notice was placed in the Journal of Field Archaeology (Vitelli 1981: 361), Knight believes that the general public was not informed of the situation. Cathy Andreen, spokeswoman for the University of Alabama, has confirmed that there is no record that the school made any attempt to raise public awareness of the theft, and a spokesman for the FBI, the lead law enforcement agency on the case in 1980, stated that the bureau could find no mention of the theft in agency records (Reeves 2009).

Moundville Archaeological Site, source unknown.

Moundville Archaeological Site, source unknown.

In 2009 Knight believed that the case is not entirely cold and there is a good chance the Moundville material may still be recoverable, especially if it remains in the United States (Reeves 2009). All of the stolen artefacts had been thoroughly recorded and photographed by Margaret Hardin of the University of Maine and Vincas Steponaitis of the State University of New York prior to the theft (Vitelli 1981: 361). Images of all missing pieces have been made available on a website devoted to their recovery (see: http://museums.ua.edu/oar/stolenartifacts/).

At the time of writing, none of the artefacts have been recovered and the whereabouts of all 264 pieces from Moundville are unknown.

References

Reeves, Jay (2009), ‘Archaeological Heist Revealed in Alabama’, The Associated Press, 11 February.

University of Alabama (n.d.), ‘Stolen Pottery Vessels from Moundville’, Website of the Office of Archaeological Research,<http://museums.ua.edu/oar/stolenartifacts/>, accessed 14 August 2012.

Vitelli, Karen D. (1981), ‘The Antiquities Market: Major Theft of Mississippian Pots’, The Journal of Field Archaeology, 8(3): 361.