Garland Sarcophagus
Author: Donna Yates
Last Modified: 28 Jul 2017
Second century Roman piece looted from Turkey and returned in a deal that included a tax write off for the buyer.
Sometime before 1987 a large and elaborately decorated sarcophagus was located by looters near ancient Docemia. They re-buried it for a time in western Turkey before it could be smuggled out of the country (Balan 1994). The 2 meter by 1 meter by 1.5 meter, 4 metric ton marble sarcophagus was crafted in AD 180 and has been referred to as a “garland sarcophagus” due to its decorative motif of puttis/cherubs holding a garland that is looped around the outside of the sarcophagus.
The exact smuggling route of the sarcophagus is unclear. Turkish journalists Melik Kaylen and Özgen Acar working in 1990 were able to connect the piece to an antiquities smuggler and dealer in Munich named Edip Telli who was later sentenced to ten years in prison in Turkey for antiquities-related crimes (see: Acar 2001; Hürriyet 2003), but were unable to find out how the piece left Turkey (Norman 1993). The sarcophagus was then sold on to Damon Mezzacappa, a principal at Lazard Freres investment bank, for $1 million USD (Pope 1994). In 1987 Mezzacappa lent it to the Brooklyn Museum (Balan 1994) where it was displayed in the Greek, Roman and Coptic Hall.
The appearance of the garland sarcophagus in a high-profile museum garnered the attention of Turkish antiquities experts and reporters because a very similar sarcophagus with comparable motifs was on display in a museum in Antalya (Balan 1994). The similarities between the two pieces seemed to indicate that they came from the same location, strongly suggesting that the one in the US had been looted and trafficked. Turkey threatened legal proceedings against Mezzacappa if he did not return it.
Facing mounting pressure from Turkey, Mezzacappa attempted to donate the sarcophagus to the Brooklyn Museum, hoping for a tax deduction (Norman 1993; Pope 1994). Although the museum considered the offer, Thomas Hoving, the former director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, stated that the Brooklyn Museum ultimately refused the sarcophagus when ”the lid of the sarcophagus was removed at one point and inside were a bunch of Turkish newspapers – and not dating to the 2nd century AD either” (Hoving quoted in Pope 1994). While this story is likely apocryphal the Brooklyn Museum did issue a statement saying that they had turned down the donation of the sarcophagus “because the museum was unable to determine the object’s provenance and its detailed history” (quoted in Norman 1993).
Still under Turkish pressure, Mezzacappa, donated the piece to the American-Turkish Society which, in turn, sent the sarcophagus to Turkey on what they called “permanent loan”. For the donation, Mezzacappa allegedly “was able to deduct $11m from his US tax bill”, despite official valuations of the piece being much lower than that figure (Pope 1994).
The sarcophagus was displayed at the Istanbul Archaeology Museum for six months before being sent to Antalya for permanent display near its ‘twin’ (Pope 1994).
References
Acar, Özgen (2001) Will “Blind Edip” Sing? Archaeology 54(1).
Balan, Ahmet (1994) Stolen Sarcophagus Returned. Associated Press. 26 April.
Hürriyet (2003) Yüzyılın kaçakçısı Edip Telli’ye 10 yıl istendi. Hürriyet. 8 February. Available at: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yuzyilin-kacakcisi-edip-telliye-10-yil-istendi-38539550
Norman, Geraldine (1993) Talking Turkey; Who owns the treasures of antiquity?. The Independent. 13 June.
Pope, Hugh (1994) Turkish jubilation over recovery of ancient sarcophagus; Smuggled treasure is coming home. The Independent. 27 April.